Introduction

While students and others are naturally excited to embark on a program of study toward becoming an aerospace engineer, professional and ethical responsibilities accompany being part of the profession. Numerous regulations and policies govern the design and operation of flight vehicles. However, there are also established ethical practices and codes of conduct regarding how professional aerospace engineers perform their duties. Besides “gaining technical qualifications and maintaining their technical competency,”^[1] engineers must always abide by their profession’s ethical principles. In this regard, engineers must carry out all their technical duties with utmost honesty and integrity, be considerate and respectful of professional colleagues within and outside their organization, be concerned for the safety and welfare of the public, and be aware of any legal responsibilities, liabilities, and potential consequences.

Today, engineers must also understand the potential environmental impact of their design decisions on the environment. Furthermore, they must comply with numerous local, state, and national laws and regulations, which may vary depending on the locality, state, or country in which they practice engineering. As illustrated in the schematic below, engineers must make tough decisions, so they should strive to perform their work duties with integrity, honesty, and professionalism.

Engineers must be aware of other issues related to their work activities and products, including copyright and what is or is not permitted under U.S. and international copyright law. Today, they must also be more aware of the laws governing software and various digital media to fully comply with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The implications of failing to follow copyright law and the DMCA are often underestimated, particularly by students and inexperienced engineers. The legal consequences for individuals can be severe, especially for unauthorized use or redistribution of copyrighted content, software piracy, and person-to-person sharing of software or other copyrighted digital media. An organization’s use of unauthorized software or software piracy is likely to become a legal matter.

Differences Between Morals and Ethics

Morals and ethics are often used interchangeably, but they have distinct meanings and must be carefully distinguished from one another. On the one hand, morals refer to the principles or values that guide individuals or society in determining right from wrong. The word “morals” is derived from the Latin word “moralitas,” which means “manner, character, or proper behavior.” It is the conduct or rules that a person or community may adhere to, believing these things to be obligatory. On the other hand, ethics refers to the systematic study of moral principles and their application in various contexts. The word “ethics” is derived from the Greek word “ethikos,” meaning “about character.” Ethics explores what actions are morally right or wrong, what principles should guide acceptable human behavior, and how society can make ethical judgments.

In essence, morals are the principles or values individuals or communities hold and follow, while ethics is the study and reflection on those principles and how they should be applied. Morals are more subjective and personal, varying from person to person or culture to culture, while ethics aims to provide a more objective and reasoned approach to understanding morality. Individual beliefs, cultural norms, religion, or upbringing often influence morals. In contrast, the practice of ethics seeks to evaluate and analyze moral dilemmas, providing frameworks or theories to guide objective and rational decision-making.

Therefore, ethics provide a framework for determining right from wrong within a particular context. Ethical principles are more objective and are based on sound reasoning; the underlying principle is to seek to establish a common and firm set of standards of acceptable conduct within a group or organization, i.e.,

Therefore, to have an ethical perspective, one must have some overarching explanation. Remember that ethics is fundamentally a form of moral philosophy, and philosophy is about reasoning.

Aerospace Code of Ethics

Like all professional fields, newcomers to aerospace engineering must be familiar with the code of ethics. The aerospace profession has evolved such codes of ethics over many decades, and they “establish the aerospace engineer’s standing concerning the public at large, their clients and employers, and the profession as a whole. The general principles outlined in the codes of ethics are broadly similar across the world’s engineering societies and those established by other professional authorities. Furthermore, in many countries, these codes have also been incorporated into regulatory laws and are legally enforceable; that is, ethical violations carry legal consequences that may result in civil and/or criminal penalties. Therefore, all engineers must be aware of their respective codes of practice, regardless of their location, and properly adhere to them in all their engineering tasks and duties.

The following is a top-level list of Guidelines to Practice in the U.S. under the American Institute of Aeronautics (AIAA) Code of Ethics. The complete statement is available on the AIAA’s website at https://www.aiaa.org/CodeOfEthics/.

Facing Ethical Issues

Engineers are likely to face some form of ethical issue or dilemma during their careers. Ethical dilemmas can be challenging to resolve because they involve making decisions in situations where there is no apparent correct answer; each available choice will likely have some negative consequences. The issue’s complexity is often heightened by uncertainty about the outcomes of those choices. Some of these issues may be technical, but others may be non-technical and involve broader considerations, including administrative, personnel, and possibly legal implications.

Consider the following examples, which may also pose situations for further discussion in a group setting.

1. Failure to follow practices, advice, or judgment

One example of an ethical dilemma an engineer could face is their duty to report a possible risk to others posed by a client or employer who fails to follow proper engineering practices, advice, or judgment. However, they may be reluctant to speak up or fear retribution, even if this is unlawful. The laws in the U.S. that prohibit acts of retaliation or reprisal by employers include Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It should be remembered that all professional engineers have a higher duty to society as a whole, rather than to any individual, employer, or organization. A professional engineer may be disciplined, and an employer may be sanctioned if the loss of life or well-being can be traced to a failure to follow sound engineering practices or otherwise engaging in any practice connected to ethical misconduct. In addition, if the ethical principles are part of regulatory law, as is often the case in many professions, including engineering, civil or criminal penalties may be imposed on all parties for severe misconduct cases. How might one ethically navigate this issue?

2. Honest and constructive criticism of technical work

Another example of a possible ethical dilemma is when an engineer is ethically obligated to offer honest and constructive criticism of technical work, acknowledge and correct errors, and provide feedback that is both constructive and accurate. Engineers have a professional responsibility to uphold high standards of accuracy and integrity in technical work. For example, a peer-reviewed journal publication may contain mistakes or otherwise erroneous information that should be brought to the authors’ attention and corrected in the journal, thereby contributing to the overall quality of the field. However, balancing the obligation to provide honest and constructive criticism with the potential to cause unintended professional harm to the authors can pose an ethical dilemma. How might one ethically navigate this issue? Resolving this dilemma involves balancing ethical obligations to uphold the quality and integrity of technical work with consideration of potential harm to others. Approaching the situation with professionalism, empathy, and a focus on constructive improvement would be one way, and perhaps the best way, to resolve this dilemma.

3. Potential conflict of interest

Potential conflicts of interest are common ethical concerns in the professional world. For example, consider an engineer working on a project to develop a new system for a spacecraft that their company manufactures under contract. The engineering team must select a supplier for a critical component of the propulsion system as part of the contract. The engineer finds out that one of the potential suppliers is a company owned by a friend they knew from college. They offer competitive pricing and claim to have the expertise to deliver the required components on schedule. However, you are aware of other concerns regarding the reliability and quality of this supplier’s products. Choosing your friend’s company as the supplier could create a conflict of interest, as this decision may compromise the objectivity and impartiality of the selection process. On the one hand, selecting this supplier could strengthen your relationship with your friend and benefit them financially. On the other hand, failing to deliver high-quality components on time may undermine the project’s integrity, jeopardizing the spacecraft’s success and damaging your company’s reputation. How might one navigate this conflict of interest ethically?

Other Examples of Ethical Concerns

Other examples of ethical concerns for a professional engineer may include the following:

• Failure to separate professional and personal relationships with clients, consultants, contractors, or others.
• Possible forms of conflict of interest, i.e., a clash between self-serving interests and professional duties or responsibilities.
• Acts of bribery or the receipt of kickbacks.
• Improper treatment of confidential or proprietary information.
• Failure to ensure or advise on proper legal compliance by clients, contractors, and others.
• Conspiracy to defraud by impairing, obstructing, defeating, or interfering with lawful requirements.
• Conflicting outside employment, including activities such as “moonlighting.”
• Issues that may involve “quid pro quo,” i.e., one party gaining something of benefit for doing something else to benefit another party.
• Spreading disinformation. Typically defined as the deliberate creation and sharing of false or manipulated information intended to deceive and mislead others to protect selfish self-interests, cause harm, or for financial gain.
• Employers, co-workers, or other individuals who intimidate employees in an attempt to discredit or punish those who dissent from their actions, opinions, or judgment.

Adherence to acceptable ethical practices and fulfillment of all ethical responsibilities will generally alleviate most initial concerns. However, the issues are not always so clear-cut or straightforward, and resolving an ethical concern may not have a clear path forward.

Resolution of Ethical Concerns

In many cases, an engineer may seek advice from a colleague or manager to help resolve an ethical issue. Different viewpoints can shed light on aspects of the matter. Usually, a resolution of the concerns is forthcoming after discussion, but there may be exceptions. For example, sometimes, there may not be a clear resolution to an ethical issue, but there may still be some approaches or solutions, some of which may be better. Given the circumstances, the goal is to arrive at a reasonable, ethical, and fair resolution while also considering the perspectives and interests of all parties involved. In this regard, some compromise may also be acceptable. However, it is also essential to ensure that any proposed solutions align with legal requirements and ethical standards.

Consider the following examples, which may also pose scenarios for further discussion in a group setting.

1. Professional Obligations

Responsibilities to employers and confidentiality considerations that would otherwise prevent an engineer from acting ethically and in the public interest are considered exceptionally serious by professional engineering societies and other authorities. All engineering societies, including the AIAA, have ethics review boards. They may also have legal implications through the courts and aviation certification authorities, such as the FAA or EASA. Such issues can have severe repercussions for both employers and employees. In the case of a breach of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), for example, legal consequences and/or fines are always likely. For pilots and other FAA-certified individuals, suspension or revocation of licenses can result. For organizations, a serious breach of the FARs could result in the temporary or permanent revocation of operating certifications.

2. Unethical Employers

An employee may discover that they are working for an unethical employer, possibly one with ongoing legal issues. Therefore, the employee must be especially vigilant to ensure they are not implicated in their employer’s dishonest and/or illegal behavior. Employers have many incentives to refute accusations of unethical or criminal misconduct made against them by employees or others.^[2] While workplace intimidation or bullying by employers is not only unethical and illegal, it still happens. Unfortunately, a toxic or dictatorial corporate culture is the primary reason for employee attrition, which is an unhealthy environment for everyone. Some employees may choose to “walk away” and resign from organizations facing ethical dilemmas or wrongdoing rather than stay and potentially face professional, legal, or reputational consequences.

3. Whistleblowing

Whistleblowing is usually, if not always, a last resort in resolving an ethical matter. Still, based on legal case history, it is not an uncommon action for an employee to take legal or other action against their organization if it exhibits poor judgment, questionable conduct, uses unsafe processes, or engages in some form of illegal activity. For example, corporate disinformation is an illegal action because it involves the dissemination of misleading information about the organization or the concealment of potentially damaging information. In the U.S., under federal and state laws, employees who report illegal conduct, unlawful intimidation, safety hazards, disinformation, and other similar issues within an organization are theoretically protected against employer retaliation. Nevertheless, whistleblowing should never be considered the first or even an early action by an employee to resolve an ethical matter. In most cases, employees will seek sound legal advice before acting as a whistleblower, allowing them to consider options for potential resolution. Various factors, including personal values and the risk of future unemployment, can influence the decision to be a whistleblower.

Consequences of Ethical Misconduct

Professional engineering societies, such as AIAA, all have ethics review boards. For serious ethics violations by individuals, these boards may issue sanctions that include suspension or expulsion from the society, sometimes simultaneously revoking all professional qualifications or licenses. In cases involving loss of life or well-being, the courts have typically sided with those who have spoken out against an employer or other organization for failing to follow accepted or sound engineering practices. Therefore, it is clear that full compliance with ethical and other professional standards is always the best course of action.

The ethical misconduct scandals at Volkswagen over a vehicle emissions control device and at Boeing Commercial Aircraft over the flight-control system malfunction that led to two fatal crashes of the 737-MAX, resulting in the loss of 346 lives, are now case studies of egregious ethical misconduct. The aftermath of these cases has resulted in considerable harm to the two organizations, their employees, the professional engineering field as a whole, and the general public. In both cases, an emphasis on corporate profits over sound engineering and safety practices was at the root of the ethical misconduct. Boeing and Volkswagen were subjected to criminal prosecution and massive billion-dollar fines in the U.S. justice system. Of particular concern for aviation is that the “Misleading statements, half-truths, and omissions communicated by Boeing employees to the FAA impeded the government’s ability to ensure the safety of the flying public.”

Of course, bad outcomes will always occur in any organizational culture that prioritizes profits over ethical conduct and the well-being of its employees and the public, especially if it also goes so far as to discredit, threaten, or otherwise punish anyone bold enough to dissent from its actions. Such actions are not only unethical but also illegal. However, an engineer’s ethical responsibilities must still consider essential factors such as costs and schedules on behalf of their employer. The better news is that the attention brought to such ethical misconduct scandals, especially the massive professional, legal, and billion-dollar financial fallout for Boeing, means that similar issues are much less likely to occur in the future. However, only time will tell, and such matters will not be quickly forgotten; changes will only succeed if they are supported by strong ethical leadership from management.

Even if absolved of criminal wrongdoing, one lesson to be learned from such cases is the lingering effects of lawsuits and other legal actions resulting from the loss of life, which can harm an organization’s long-term credibility, competitiveness, and financial stability. Underrating the importance of ethics and the loss of public confidence in corporate leadership is a damaging and massively costly experience. While calls for change often emerge after engineering decisions that result in tragic outcomes and may have caused loss of life, scholars have argued that each new generation of students and engineers must seemingly relearn the same lessons. Such a process will require corporations, engineering societies, and teachers to be much more proactive in educating and supporting the ethical behavior of students as well as up-and-coming new engineers.

Ethics for Students

Students must strive to constantly adhere to academic ethics. Academic institutions, such as colleges and universities, aim to foster a healthy and ethically responsible environment for learning and education. Therefore, students must align with and follow their principles and policies to preserve the institution’s integrity and its standing for accreditation. Academic integrity is at the core of student ethical conduct, and all students must fully participate in maintaining and fostering academic integrity; unus malus mali multos corrumpit.

Academic integrity and ethical conduct are essential in all assignments, not just those for credit, including homework, exams, laboratory reports, projects, and presentations. Students must be truthful in conveying their answers to any assignment as representative of their work without cheating or misrepresentation. In the case of group activities, the entire group is held to this same standard. Students who fail to adhere to the standards of academic integrity can expect consequences, including sanctions. For example, a minor infraction may result in a failing grade on the assignment, while severe or repeated violations may lead to expulsion from the institution.

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is unethical conduct and a violation of academic integrity. It involves presenting someone else’s writings or other work as one’s own or using content or work products without citing or crediting the source. An example of plagiarism is copying and pasting sentences, paragraphs, or other content and submitting it as one’s own. Closely rewording (paraphrasing) content found from different sources, such as changing or adding a word here or there, especially without citation, is also a form of plagiarism.

Self-plagiarism is also unethical and a violation of academic integrity. One example is using duplicate content (e.g., previously graded homework or an essay) to satisfy the requirements of another course or class. This type of academic integrity infraction would also apply to repeating the same class, even if a different instructor teaches it. Ethically, students must use their submitted work only once unless an instructor has given explicit permission to the contrary. Taking the chance that nobody will notice is always unwise.

Avoiding Cheating

Cheating is always an unethical practice, not just in an academic setting. Cheating, or even the perception of cheating by others, can be avoided by completing one’s assignments responsibly and ethically, including homework and exams. Tasks are usually completed individually, unless a group activity has been assigned to them. A student should never copy work from another student or misrepresent another student’s work as their own. Examples of cheating include copying homework answers from another student or using unauthorized resources during an exam. Such unauthorized resources may consist of unapproved electronic devices, such as cell phones, solution manuals, tutoring services, texting, or any other item explicitly prohibited by the instructor in the course policies.

Some other examples of cheating may include:

• Facilitating or aiding and abetting the cheating efforts of other students.
• Doing an assignment for another student, such as writing, editing, or rewriting the submission, in whole or in part.
• Copying or even attempting to copy answers from another student during an exam.
• Having in their possession, without permission from the instructor, any exams or other materials belonging to faculty, staff, or another student.
• Giving another student answers to previous exam questions or other assignments unless the instructor or other faculty have expressly authorized the release of the answers.

Copyright Matters

All engineers must be familiar with copyright issues, copyright law, and its practical implications on their day-to-day practices, work products, and other activities. Copyright matters are covered as part of U.S. and international law. In the U.S., the copyright law is published by the Copyright Office: https://www.copyright.gov/title17/. Copyright protects the creators of original works, such as reports, books, photographs, graphics, diagrams, figures, videos, music, and designs. Remember that copyright law also applies to all forms of digital media, including all types of software.

What Does Copyright Mean?

Copyright protection means that if someone creates an original work product, they own it. An original work means any authorship in a tangible medium of expression. Although there are exceptions, this rule generally always holds. Exceptions may include “work made for hire,” which means that if a work product is created for someone else who paid for it, such as an employer or some other organization (e.g., as a paid consultant to the organization), then the employer or another party may be able to claim copyright ownership of your work. However, in this latter regard, shared authorship is usually considered a standard operating practice. Nevertheless, a consultant may not have publication rights to work produced under a work-for-hire agreement.

Copyright also protects both published and unpublished works. That is, a given work on tangible media does not need to be formally published anywhere to be covered by copyright law. It is a fallacy that the copyright symbol needs to be used and attached to copyright any work. Nevertheless, if used, a copyright notice should contain the word “copyright” or a “c” in a circle , the date of publication, and the name of the author or owner of all the work. However, copyright is always implied on any authored materials in tangible, physical, or electronic media. Copyright also applies to most, if not all, college and university course materials, such as a professor’s course packets, course slides, homework problems, exam questions, solutions, etc.

Copyright law cannot protect intangible assets, such as ideas. Just because someone has a good idea does not mean it is immediately protected under copyright law. Nevertheless, if someone writes down or records the concept on any tangible media, including paper or electronic formats, then their idea will be immediately protected under copyright law. The idea, however, must be original and/or creative. Scientific and historical facts, accepted theories, established methods and equations, and content considered “common knowledge” are generally not protected under copyright law.

Avoiding Copyright Infringement

It should always be assumed that copyright applies to all work products, published or otherwise. Copyright rules and laws can be complicated, but generally apply from the date of creation plus 70 years after the author’s death. In other words, copyright is legally enforceable for the author’s entire lifetime plus 70 years beyond that. However, there are several categories in which copyrighted content may be published and used by others, so caution should be employed to fully comply with copyright protocols and laws.

Public Domain

When the copyright expires, the work enters the public domain, meaning it is available without any concerns over who holds the rights to it, allowing anyone to freely use it in any form they choose. However, they still cannot claim ownership of the work. If known, proper attribution is an ethical responsibility, even if it is not legally required. All work published in the United States before 1924 is in the public domain. Works published after 1923 but before 1978 do not enter the public domain for 95 years from the date of their publication.

U.S. Government publications are generally in the public domain, and their work products are not subject to copyright restrictions, at least in the U.S. Work done under a U.S. Government contract (e.g., research at a university) typically belongs to the principal researcher, students, and/or the university. For example, the copyright of a thesis or dissertation, including the results and the data therein, will belong to the student and not to the sponsor of the work (if any). Nevertheless, sharing research data is a common practice, although any republication of the data will always require specific permission from the work’s creator to satisfy both ethical and copyright responsibilities.

Some other types of materials may already be in the public domain, but this is rare. Materials found on Wikipedia, Wikimedia, and similar platforms are generally not in the public domain, even though the copyright holder often declares them to be open-source, such as under a Creative Commons license. Creative Commons (CC) licenses promote collaboration, sharing, and creativity while respecting the original creators’ copyright. Still, using such work products should always be done with attribution, depending on the type of Creative Commons (CC) license.

Fair Use

What is known as “fair use” is an exception to the restrictions imposed by copyright law. Fair use applies mainly to academic, educational, or instructional purposes, or other “not-for-profit” purposes, i.e., its use does not lead to financial profit for the user of the work. Fair use extends to “brief excerpts” of the work, usually considered less than 10% of any given document, one figure, photograph, etc., from one source. Fair use, however, does not extend to entire documents or other complete works.

The underlying rationale of “fair use” for academic purposes is that the education of students will benefit by including some parts of the copyrighted material. A broader question that serves as a good test of fair use is: “Does my use of someone else’s work diminish the value of the original work to the copyright holder?” If not, then it is acceptable to use the work under the terms of fair use. However, asking for the copyright holder’s permission and giving attribution is always a good policy; a simple acknowledgment may be all that is needed in most cases.

Very few copyright holders will expect a royalty fee or other payment for the educational use of their work; however, this should not be assumed. Exceptions may include specific organizations or copyright clearing centers, which require payment of copyright fees before any published work can be used in another work.

Creative Commons

Creative Commons is a non-profit organization that provides free, easy-to-use legal tools for creators and users of creative work. Creative Commons licenses allow creators to share their work with others while retaining certain rights, including those afforded to them under copyright law. There are six different Creative Commons licenses, each with its own set of conditions. These conditions range from requiring attribution to the original creator to allowing commercial use of the work. By using a Creative Commons (CC) license, creators can ensure that their work is freely and openly shared, while also being used in a way that aligns with their goals and values.

Individuals, organizations, and governments worldwide have widely adopted Creative Commons licenses. They are used by professors, artists, musicians, writers, teachers, and scientists, among others, to share their work and promote collaboration and innovation. Many online platforms support Creative Commons licenses, making it easy for people to share their work and for users to find and use it legally. For example, this e-textbook is made available under a Creative Commons (CC), non-commercial, and non-derivative license. However, it should be noted that a CC license sits “on top of” the copyright and does not replace it, so the copyright symbol (if used) indicates the copyright holder, and the CC statement indicates the public usage rights the copyright holder is granting. It is essential to remember that copyright law still applies to work published under a CC license, and the terms an author uses to share their work should always be respected, as this is both a legal requirement and an ethical obligation.

Gaining Permissions

Using work products from other sources should always be done with permission, regardless of the copyright status of those products. An author or creator, hence the copyright owner, always has the right to dictate precisely how their work can be used. Most authors are pleased that their work helps others. Indeed, the copyright owner of a tangible medium, such as a photograph or graphic, will allow almost anyone to use their work with permission and attribution.

Gaining permission from the author of a copyrighted work may require a request using a letter or an email, but the request and the permissions (if obtained) should always be in writing. Work published under a Creative Commons license should always be given the appropriate attribution, even though explicit consent from the author to use the work need not be obtained. For example, all the images in this e-textbook are made freely available for anyone to use under a Creative Commons (CC) license. However, attribution is still expected and is legally required.

Penalties for Copyright Infringement

“Copyright infringement is the act of exercising, without permission or legal authority, one or more of the exclusive rights granted to the copyright owner under section 106 of the Copyright Act (Title 17 of the U.S. Code). These rights include the right to reproduce or distribute a copyrighted work. In file-sharing, downloading or uploading substantial parts of a copyrighted work without authority constitutes an infringement.”

Therefore, copyright infringement means using someone’s work without their permission or other means that do not align with the copyright declaration. Copyright infringement is a serious offense that can result in significant legal and criminal consequences, including fines and other penalties. It is illogical for an engineer, employer, student, or other individual to risk the imposition of sanctions or penalties for improper use of content and potential copyright violations. Therefore, permissions should always be sought and explicitly given to the user by the copyright holder. Copyright infringement penalties can be severe, including both civil and criminal penalties.

Those liable for civil copyright infringement may be ordered to pay actual or statutory damages for each infringed work. In addition, for any willful infringement, a court may award up to $150,000 per work or license that has been infringed. A court can also assess costs and attorneys’ fees. For more information, see the U.S. Copyright Office’s website at www.copyright.gov, especially their FAQs at www.copyright.gov/help/faq.

Students are not exempt from the law, and copyright infringements committed by them will carry the same legal force as those committed by anyone else. Students who violate any copyright law may also be charged with violating their college or university honor code, e.g., for fraud, and risk sanctions such as probation, suspension, or expulsion.

What is the DMCA?

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a 1998 amendment to U.S. copyright law. This law applies to copyrighted material uploaded to the internet in digital form. The DMCA becomes applicable if a person:

• Downloads copyrighted content from the internet and publishes it elsewhere without the copyright owner’s permission,
• Uploading copyrighted content to a website or other online platform without the copyright owner’s permission.
• Digitally shares any copyrighted work without the copyright owner’s permission.
• Shares copyrighted software tools or other copyrighted software, e.g., the person-to-person or peer-to-peer (P2P) sharing of software or software piracy.

Exceptions to downloading digital content may include fair use, which is considered acceptable in an academic setting but not always for other purposes. For copyright infringements under the DMCA, the copyright owner may ask that the online copyright infringement be rectified. Remember that, like other aspects of U.S. copyright law, the DMCA outlines both legal and criminal penalties for copyright violations.

For example, suppose a copyright holder files a DMCA Takedown Notice for a potential copyright violation on the internet or other online platforms. In that case, the internet service provider is required by law to take specific actions. To this end, the law requires that the uploader be informed of the concern raised by the copyright holder and that the service provider immediately remove any infringed work. If there is no resolution, then legal and other actions may ensue, for example, the uploader may face a lawsuit from the copyright holder. In addition, legal resolution of any copyright infringement may result in civil and criminal penalties for the violator. Such situations are relatively rare, but they do happen.

Most commercial software, such as MATLAB, is copyrighted and subject to the intellectual property rights of the software developers. An organization’s use of unauthorized software will more than likely become a legal matter. Software vendors and copyright holders may take legal action against individuals or organizations to protect their intellectual property and recover damages. Many industries are subject to regulatory and auditing requirements, including software licensing compliance; non-compliance can lead to significant legal and financial consequences.

Ethical Scenarios to Consider

Learning more about professional ethics and ethical conduct can be achieved by considering ethical scenarios. These provide concrete examples of dilemmas or situations where ethical principles come into play, allowing one to analyze, discuss, and reflect on the various factors involved. By engaging with ethical scenarios, individuals can develop their ethical reasoning skills, gain a deeper understanding of different perspectives, and cultivate a more nuanced appreciation for the complexities of ethical decision-making. An active approach to learning about ethics helps individuals apply ethical principles to situations they may encounter in professional practice.

Using ChatGPT

ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence (AI) language model. ChatGPT says, “I exist solely to provide information, answer questions, and engage in conversations. While AI technology advances, humans ultimately control its development and implementation. AI is designed to assist and augment human capabilities, not to replace or overpower them.”

As a student or a practicing engineer, ChatGPT can be a valuable tool to assist you with various tasks and enhance your learning experience. However, using it effectively, responsibly, and ethically, and understanding its limitations, is essential. ChatGPT announces the following points about its capabilities and limitations:

1. “Research and Learning: ChatGPT can help you find information and understand complex topics by providing explanations and examples. Use it to clarify concepts, gather different perspectives, and explore ideas. However, always cross-verify the information you receive and consult authoritative sources to ensure its accuracy. ChatGPT has many areas for improvement in engineering topics.”
2. Writing Assistance: “ChatGPT can help generate ideas, overcome writer’s block, and get feedback on your writing. It can suggest alternative phrases and sentence structures or provide examples. However, remember that it is still an AI model, not a substitute for your critical thinking and creativity. Take the suggestions as starting points and tailor them to your writing style.”
3. Language Practice: “Conversing with ChatGPT can help improve your language skills. You can practice grammar and vocabulary and even have simulated discussions on various topics.”
4. Problem-Solving and Programming: “ChatGPT can assist you in understanding programming concepts, debugging code, and providing general problem-solving guidance. It can suggest possible solutions or help you identify errors. However, be cautious when relying on ChatGPT for programming tasks, as it may not always produce correct or optimized code.”
5. Ethical Considerations: “ChatGPT is a machine-learning model trained on vast amounts of data. While it strives to provide helpful information, it may sometimes generate biased or incorrect responses. Be critical of the information it provides and assess its reliability. Avoid using ChatGPT for sensitive or personal topics that require human expertise or empathy.”
6. Academic Integrity: “It is important to remember that different universities use AI tools differently. Some instructors will encourage you to use ChatGPT as a resource, while others may ban it altogether. It is essential to consult your university’s academic integrity policy on using AI tools.”
7. Privacy and Security: “When using ChatGPT, be mindful of the information you share. Avoid sharing personal or sensitive data. Treat ChatGPT like any other public platform, and refrain from sharing your private information.”
8. Supplement Your Learning: “ChatGPT should be considered a supplementary tool, not a replacement for traditional learning resources, textbooks, or professors. Use it to complement your studies, clarify doubts, and explore new ideas. Always maintain a balanced approach to ensure comprehensive learning.”

Remember that while ChatGPT can assist, taking an active role in one’s education and professional development is essential. To this end, “it is important to engage in critical thinking, seek diverse perspectives, consult reliable sources, speak with professors, and actively participate in one’s own learning. It is important to check the academic institution’s policies before using ChatGPT to help with assignments.”

Summary & Closure

The field of aerospace engineering has ethical and legal responsibilities that all engineers must adhere to and uphold. The profession has established these ethical principles over many decades. They establish an aerospace engineer’s standing among their clients, employers, the profession as a whole, and the public at large. In addition, ethical policies may be part of regulatory law in some countries or jurisdictions, so that ethical violations could result in civil or criminal penalties.

Copyright laws generally cover most engineering work products, and the ownership of the work typically belongs to the person who created it. However, in some cases, if the work is done for someone else (e.g., an employer), it may be considered a “work for hire,” and the copyright of the work may belong to the employer. The bottom line is that people cannot do whatever they want with someone else’s work, and everyone should follow the law and seek permission to use the work products created by others. Copyright also applies to most online digital material, i.e., anything found on and/or used from the internet. Exceptions include work declared in the public domain, which applies to most work products of the U.S. government or those published before 1924.

Generally, permission to use the work should be obtained from the owner, or you should abide by “fair use” principles. Fair use of content is entirely appropriate in an academic setting, such as for instructional or educational purposes, but is rarely applicable to other uses. Professors and other instructors utilize content from various sources to enrich their students’ educational experience, and much of this content may be protected under the terms of fair use. This is one reason why students should not distribute any course materials beyond their personal use. In many cases, there may be legal consequences, such as a lawsuit for copyright infringement other than fair use, and this is never a desirable position to be in. As a student, it is essential to understand and follow copyright laws because they apply to everyone. Properly attributing work shows respect for the creators and demonstrates an ethical and legal responsibility.